Hot Posts

6/recent/ticker-posts

Angela Rayner defends removing ‘beauty’ requirement from new planning rules for homes – UK politics live

Deputy PM says the ‘subjective’ wording was preventing and blocking development

A reader asks:

I was wondering if you ever got a response from the DHSC yesterday as to why the previous government claimed settling the junior doctors’ dispute would cost £1.7billion?

The real challenge we’ve got at the moment is the 2012 changes to right to buy [the discount was increased] meant that we can’t replace the stock, because the taxpayers are funding us creating social homes and then we’re not able to replace them once they are sold off at a highly discounted rate.

We think right to buy is something people should have, if you’ve raised your family in your home, you’ve been in it a long time, then this should be a way for you to buy it. But we don’t think the current situation is tenable when we want to build more social housing.

Continue reading...

Post a Comment

0 Comments